الدوريات والمجلات الأكاديمية
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://ddeposit.univ-alger2.dz/handle/20.500.12387/2413
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Dynamisme Du Discours Rapporté : Analyse Discursive Des Représentations(Revue algérienne des sciences du langage (RADSL), 2025-12-27) Bouchouicha MeriemCette recherche s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’analyse du discours politique. En adoptant une approche énonciative, nous avons essayé d’étudier le rôle et la fonction des discours rapportés dans la construction et la déconstruction des représentations liées à l’Islam, à travers l’analyse des discours politiques du président Bouteflika, après les attentats du 11 septembre 2001. Le corpus d’étude est constitué d’un ensemble de discours politiques sur l’interculturalité, couvrant la période 2001-2009. L’analyse a mis en lumière les représentations tant positives que négatives reliées à l’Islam, ainsi que la manière dont ces discours viennent ancrer les modalités de perception et les relations sociales. This research falls within the framework of political discourse analysis and adopts an enunciative approach to examine the role and function of reported speech in constructing and deconstructing representations related to Islam. The study focuses on the analysis of President Bouteflika’s political speeches delivered in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks. The study corpus consists of a set of political speeches on interculturality, covering the period from 2001 to 2009. The analysis highlights both the positive and negative representations associated with Islam, as well as the ways in which these speeches contribute to shaping modes of perception and social relationsItem From Semantics To Pragmatics: Analysis And Interpretation Of Some Adversave Connectors According To Ducrot And Anscombr(2024-06-28) Mesbahi, KhaledSummary Between the potter who shapes his piece with the genius of the skilful movements of his fingers and the researcher who shapes his writing with the genius of the skilful movements of his cognitive operations, the text offers itself more to interpretative complexity. From Ducrot and Anscombre to Moeschler and Reboul, a semantic-pragmatic conception where meaning and interpretation come from semantic immanence is built at the crossroads of approaches aimed at the construction of meaning. We try, in a strongly reductionist approach (discourse is reduced to the statements that compose it) and strongly contextualist (the principles that govern the interpretation of discourses are the same as those that govern the interpretation of statements), to explain how the speaker represented in the statement can become, in the complexity of the speeches, a source of confusion on the part of the reader or the listener in certain argumentative movements. We will explain, for example, the cases where the speaker uses the opinion of a third person to support his own thesis, or when he presents the thought of others in a negative way in order to indicate his disagreement, or again, when he agrees to make a concession to an opposing idea but in reality it is only to refute it with another statement. If we have chosen to work on politic discourse, it is because that politics is the excellent meeting place, the breeding ground for conflicts of opinions in polemical and controversial aspect