| dc.description.abstract | 
Recognized as a skill of enduring importance, critical thinking has witnessed 
increased attention in recent years, but questions still remain regarding its nature, and 
what constitutes this intellectual value. As a matter-of-fact, the notion of criticality and its 
place in higher education has been mostly framed within a Western cognitive approach 
which tends to favour the centrality of skills of reasoning and falls short of extending it 
beyond the realms of argumentation and logic. Many scholars allude to some abstract 
universality in thinking while neglecting its relation to cultural context. This study draws 
on a postmodernist approach, and is framed within an interpretive phenomenological 
methodology informed by the ideas of phenomenologists such as Heidegger, Merleau Ponty and Van Manen. The aim is to deconstruct existing conceptualizations of critical 
thinking prominent in Western academic discourse and suggest a reconstruction of the 
concept by situating it within a non-Western contextual perspective. This study also seeks 
to investigate the lived experiences and perceptions of university teachers and students of 
English in the context of Algerian higher education. Qualitative data were collected from 
12 teachers and 20 students of English in the Department of Foreign Languages at the 
University of Medea, using semi-structured teacher and student interviews, participant 
observation and reflective journal documentation. The diversity of these methods allows 
triangulation of the results, providing insights on contextuality, relationality and 
embodiment as significantly shaping the meaning and development of critical thinking in 
the Algerian university context. Other issues emerged such as authority and the 
reproduction of inequality, power relations, symbolic violence in the classroom, 
embodiment of certain forms of habitus and capital, fragmentation of efforts and 
experiences, religion, culture, politics, the educational LMD system and the EFL 
curriculum which have a bearing on the development of critical thinking. Therefore, 
critical thinking is not an abstract subject or a universal ideal mode of thinking that can 
be nurtured in all students, but its meaning and development are related to relational and 
contextual realities and to socially and culturally embodied practices which are 
structured, maintained and reproduced in the classroom and the wider field of EFL higher 
education. | 
ar_AR |